Development environments
Tool suites, build subscriptions, coding assistants. We help settle the edition and the number of seats, and licences attach to work accounts rather than to private addresses.
Example: a software publisher of a dozen people. The code sleeps in three separate places, the development environment subscriptions were paid on personal cards and reclaimed as expenses, and the production server password sits in a chat thread from two years ago. We help choose the tooling and rebuild an environment where the code, the build and the release belong to the company rather than to whoever happens to work there this year. We configure all of it remotely and you take out the subscriptions yourself, straight from the publishers.
Which text editor people prefer matters far less than this: where the code lives, and by what route it becomes a product running at a customer site.
Tool suites, build subscriptions, coding assistants. We help settle the edition and the number of seats, and licences attach to work accounts rather than to private addresses.
An organisation opened in the company name, with teams thought through in advance, protected branches, a compulsory review and two-factor sign-in for everyone.
A pipeline that builds the application on its own, runs the tests and publishes a version to a staging environment. No more hand-copying files on a Friday evening.
Passwords, interface keys and certificates kept in a software vault instead of a configuration file versioned along with the rest of the project.
A freelance developer receives access to the repositories they work on and nothing else, for the length of the engagement. At the end date the access lapses by itself.
We record which licences cover the open source components embedded in your product. A copyleft licence inside an application sold to customers is better known before signature than after. The legal reading belongs to your solicitor.
A copy of the repositories and their history held away from the platform, because a suspended account or a slip of the hand happens at large providers too.
Duration follows the number of projects and repositories; the timetable is set at the start and everything is done remotely.
Where the code sits, who can reach it, whose name the subscriptions are in, and what releasing a version looks like today.
Tools and seat counts matched to the size of the team, the technology stack and the demands of your own customers, for instance on where the code may be hosted.
Organisation, permissions, delivery pipeline, secrets vault and repository backup. Remotely, without interrupting work in progress.
A written description of the environment and an hour over video during which the team asks its questions.
Code hosted on a developer's personal account does not truly belong to the company. The day that person leaves, access to the whole history of changes can leave with them, and the question of rights is then settled with a lawyer. Moving the repositories into a company organisation is the first move to make, ahead of any choice of tooling.
Usually not. A hosted service takes administration, updates and backups off your hands. An installation of your own, or one at a French provider, earns its place when a customer contract forbids the code leaving your infrastructure, or when everything must stay inside the Union with a named supplier such as OVHcloud or Scaleway.
Yes, on two conditions. First, pick a plan whose current terms rule out training models on your code, which we verify before purchase because those terms move. Second, set plain rules: no customer data and no secrets pasted into a prompt. We apply those settings at organisation level so they do not rest on everyone's goodwill.
Almost always as a per-user subscription taken out directly with the publisher. What matters is that it stands in the company name and attaches to a work account. A subscription bought on a private address walks out with the employee and the money is gone.
Most teams already work largely with free tooling: version control, containers, editors, libraries. What gets paid for is the full suites, the assistants and the build minutes in the cloud. We take the opportunity to reread the terms of the libraries sitting inside whatever you resell.
None whatsoever. We are neither a reseller nor an introducer and no publisher pays us anything. You buy directly, on your own legal entity, and you pay us only for the time spent choosing, costing and configuring. That is the only way advice stays advice.
Tell us how many developers you have and where the code lives today. We will propose a set of tools and tidy up the subscriptions.
Message received
An answer follows inside one working day. Report an outage that is stopping people working and it moves ahead of everything else.
Nothing here under that name. Check the spelling, or simply choose the nearest large city instead. Since every engagement runs remotely, whichever you pick changes nothing about what we do for you.